Fixed recoverable costs set the amount of legal costs that the winning party can claim back from the losing party in civil litigation. They already apply in most low-value personal injury cases.
FRCs prescribe the amount of damages that can be claimed back from a losing party in civil litigation; they are a way of controlling the legal costs by giving certainty in advance.
The civil justice system in England and Wales has a “loser pays” model, whereby the unsuccessful party covers the costs of the successful party.
This can lead to high costs for the unsuccessful party.
FRCs give both parties certainty as to the maximum amount they may have to pay if unsuccessful and can ensure that the costs of cases are proportionate to the sum in issue.
FRC currently operate in most low value personal injury cases. The government and senior judiciary announced their support for extending FRC in November 2016, and Sir Rupert Jackson, then a judge of the Court of Appeal, was commissioned by the senior judiciary to develop proposals.
Sir Rupert’s report, which was published in July 2017, follows on from his major report of 2010 looking at civil costs more widely, which led to significant reforms to controlling costs, including “no win, no fee” reforms in the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012. Sir Rupert’s July 2017 supplementary report which focuses on the extension of FRC, completes his recommendations.
We believe that it is now right to consider the extension of FRC.
We are seeking views from all those with an interest in civil costs in England and Wales. Our proposals, which are set out in the consultation paper, take forward Sir Rupert’s recommendations.