Roy Black: The Acclaimed Defender of Justice and Liberty

In the realm of American civil and criminal defence trial attorneys, one name shines bright – Roy Black. With a career spanning decades, Black has earned a reputation as a legal titan, renowned for his remarkable achievements in the courtroom. From securing the acquittal of William Kennedy Smith on charges of rape in 1991 to representing conservative radio commentator Rush Limbaugh, Roy Black’s legal prowess has left an indelible mark on the legal world. In this article, we’ll delve into the extraordinary career of Roy Black, exploring his notable cases, legal philosophy, and the impact he has made on the world of law.

A Brief Overview of Roy Black’s Career

Roy Black, born in New York City in 1945, embarked on his journey in the legal profession with a fervor for justice and a deep commitment to defending the rights of his clients. He attended the University of Miami School of Law, where he honed his legal acumen and graduated with distinction.

Black’s Career Milestones

The William Kennedy Smith Case (1991): One of the defining moments of Roy Black’s career was his successful defence of William Kennedy Smith, a nephew of Senator Ted Kennedy, who faced charges of rape. In a high-stakes trial that captivated the nation, Black’s masterful legal skills secured an acquittal for Smith, cementing his reputation as a formidable courtroom advocate.

Representation of Rush Limbaugh: Roy Black’s client list extends to some of the most prominent figures in the United States. He notably represented Rush Limbaugh, the conservative radio commentator, during a highly publicised legal battle. Black’s unwavering dedication to defending his clients’ rights was evident throughout the case.

Roy Black’s Legal Philosophy

At the heart of Roy Black’s success is his unwavering commitment to upholding the principles of justice and the rule of law. His legal philosophy can be distilled into several key principles:

Presumption of Innocence: Roy Black firmly believes in the principle of “innocent until proven guilty.” Throughout his career, he has relentlessly championed this core tenet of the American legal system, ensuring that every client receives a fair and impartial trial.

Thorough Preparation: Black’s meticulous preparation for each case is legendary. He leaves no stone unturned, dissecting every piece of evidence, scrutinising witness testimonies, and crafting compelling arguments that resonate with judges and juries alike.

Effective Communication: A masterful orator, Roy Black possesses the rare ability to convey complex legal concepts to a lay audience. His persuasive courtroom presence and articulate arguments have played a pivotal role in many of his triumphs.

Adaptive Strategy: Black understands that no two cases are identical. He tailors his legal strategy to the unique circumstances of each case, adapting to changing dynamics and employing innovative approaches when necessary.

The Impact of Roy Black’s Work

Roy Black’s legal career has left an indelible mark on the world of law and the broader society. His work serves as an inspiration to aspiring attorneys and a reminder of the crucial role played by defense lawyers in preserving the integrity of the justice system. Beyond his legal victories, Black’s influence extends to legal education, where he has shared his knowledge and experience as a professor.


In the annals of American legal history, few names stand as tall as that of Roy Black. His dedication to justice, unwavering commitment to the presumption of innocence, and his remarkable achievements in the courtroom have solidified his legacy as an American legal icon. From the high-profile William Kennedy Smith case to his representation of Rush Limbaugh, Roy Black’s career has been nothing short of extraordinary. As we reflect on his contributions to the legal profession, we are reminded of the enduring importance of upholding the principles of justice and liberty in our society, values that Roy Black has steadfastly defended throughout his illustrious career.

7 Bradley Attorneys Ranked in Chambers USA 2022

With 10 offices located in Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and the District of Columbia, Bradley have an extensive geographic base to represent clients on a regional, national, and international basis. Bradley frequently serve as national coordinating counsel, regional counsel, and state-wide counsel for clients in various industries.

Bradley law firm is pleased to announce that six practice areas and seven partners have been ranked nationally in the 2022 edition of Chambers USA, the prestigious legal industry referral guide. 7 Bradley attorneys were highly ranked.

Bradley attorneys ranked nationally in their areas of practice:

  1. Aron C. Beezley – Nationwide: Government Contracts
  2. Lindsey C Boney IV – Nationwide: Product Liability & Mass Torts
  3. Tripp Haston – Nationwide: Product Liability & Mass Torts
  4. Amy S. Leopard – Nationwide: Privacy & Data Security: Healthcare
  5. Robert Maddox – Nationwide: Financial Services Regulation: Consumer Finance
  6. Kimberly B. Martin – Nationwide: Product Liability & Mass Torts
  7. Haydn J. Richards Jr. – Nationwide: Financial Services Regulation: Consumer Finance

“The inclusion of these individual attorneys and these practice areas in Chambers USA is a testament to the highly skilled work being done across our firm on a national and international level.” said Bradley Chairman of the Board and Managing Partner Jonathan M. Skeeters.

Bradley is a national law firm with a reputation for skilled legal work, exceptional client service, and impeccable integrity. We provide business clients around the world with a full suite of legal services in dozens of industries and practice areas.

Independent research company Chambers determines its rankings of leading United States firms and attorneys through in-depth research and interviews with law firms, clients and third parties.

Chambers assesses attorneys on attributes valued most by clients, including technical legal ability, professional conduct, client service, commercial astuteness, diligence, and commitment.

Useful Tips On How To Choose The Top Law Firm

Choosing a top law firm! No matter what you are into or how big or small your problem is, if you need professional help then the best thing that you could do is to search for the top law firm in your area. There are quite a number of highly qualified lawyers out there ready to serve you and give their expertise to aid with legal matters. But how to choose them?

Location is important

You want to make sure that you are picking a law firm that is close by. This way, you won’t have to worry about the travel time and the stress it will bring each time that you need their help. You do not want to go somewhere far just for them to tell you to come back next week after all the work has been done. For example, if you need assistance in California, you can look at a law firm in California, and this goes for any location you are in. It can be difficult if you live in the middle of nowhere, and you’re looking for a law firm that is several states away because your travel time will be greater than the work they would do.

Credentials matter

A law firm cannot just pick itself up off the street and call itself a top law firm. They have to have some credentials, which you can easily find online or by asking them yourself. You want to choose a law firm that has been in business for years because this means they are good at what they do. This also means that their track record is clean, so you will not have to worry about any bad reviews that could scare you away from them. A top law firm must be dedicated and focused on providing their clients with everything that they need in order to come out of court victorious.

Knowledge matters too

Aside from being skilled in legal matters, a top law firm should be knowledgeable when it comes to personal concerns as well. If you have a case that is quite sensitive, and you need some advice, the last thing you want is for your lawyer to be uneducated about it. A top law firm should also be able to respect the wishes of their clients and do everything possible within the confines of the law, so they can win their cases or reach an amicable solution with other parties involved. In addition, a good law firm should be open-minded enough to listen to their client’s opinions even if they are not in line with their thinking.


Experience is one of the most important factors when it comes to being a top law firm. After all, who would want to hire a law firm that has no experience whatsoever? You will be taking a big risk hiring an unknown entity, and you could end up losing your case if they don’t know what they are doing. A top law firm must have years of experience, so you can rest easy knowing that the person handling your case knows how it is done. It also shows that they are reputable and accountable because they’ve been in business long enough to have a solid track record.

Price should not be the only thing you focus on

Of course, price matters too, especially if you don’t have the budget for something expensive. However, it would be unwise to choose the cheapest option. Instead, you should do some research and find out which law firm has the best deal for their services. For example, if one firm is offering a flat rate while another charge per hour, then pick the former because it’s better value for your money, and you know that they won’t be wasting any time with unnecessary work. The price difference should not be something to make you change your mind or not hire a firm. You can check out all the details and agreements before you sign anything, so there will be no surprises for either party when it’s time to pay up.

Your relationship with your lawyer counts too

Just like in every other industry, people who cannot get along never get anywhere, even if they come from different backgrounds or cultures. There needs to be mutual respect between both parties, so everyone can achieve what they want without feeling overwhelmed by stress and anxiety each day during trial proceedings. If you feel uncomfortable around your lawyer, then it will not be easy for you to tell them everything that is going on in your life. It is a two-way street where you both need to give and take in order for the case to be a success.

The law firm that you believe is a top law firm must have all of these attributes—credentials, experience, knowledge of more than just legal matters, and the ability to respect their clients. So, if you are looking for a law firm that can handle your case then you need to choose not just the cheapest one but also the best-qualified one. Good luck!

Michael Hay Closes First and Only Foreign Law Firm in North Korea

In a surprising turn of events, Michael Hay, an Australian lawyer who established the first and only foreign law firm in North Korea, has announced the closure of his firm after several years of operation. This unprecedented venture garnered significant attention for bridging legal practices between the reclusive nation and the international community. The closure marks the end of an intriguing chapter in diplomatic and legal history. This article delves into the reasons behind the closure and reflects on the impact of Hay’s pioneering endeavour.

A Bold Venture: Michael Hay’s Law Firm in North Korea

Michael Hay’s law firm, founded in Pyongyang, North Korea, was a ground-breaking initiative that aimed to create a platform for legal cooperation between North Korea and the outside world. Operating within a complex and secretive legal landscape, Hay’s firm navigated challenges to provide legal services to foreign investors seeking to engage with the North Korean market. The firm’s presence also raised questions about the potential for fostering diplomatic ties through legal exchanges.

Reasons for Closure

Changing Political Dynamics: One significant factor contributing to the closure of the law firm is the ever-shifting political landscape of North Korea. The nation’s diplomatic relations with various countries have fluctuated over the years, impacting the firm’s ability to maintain a stable client base. International sanctions, in particular, have posed challenges to the firm’s operations and growth.

Limited Legal Reforms: Despite the initial optimism surrounding the establishment of the law firm, North Korea’s legal system remained largely unchanged. The absence of substantial legal reforms hindered the firm’s ability to offer comprehensive legal services, leaving it with limited avenues for growth and diversification.

Sanctions and Economic Isolation: The strict international sanctions imposed on North Korea as a response to its nuclear ambitions significantly impacted the firm’s operations. Financial transactions and communication with clients abroad became increasingly difficult, making it hard for the firm to sustain its activities.

Impact and Significance

Diplomatic Dialogue: Michael Hay’s initiative offered a unique channel for diplomatic dialogue between North Korea and the rest of the world. By engaging in legal cooperation, the firm paved the way for conversations that extended beyond politics and into the realm of law and governance.

Legal Exchange: The law firm’s establishment facilitated the exchange of legal knowledge and practices between foreign lawyers and their North Korean counterparts. This exchange had the potential to introduce new concepts and ideas into North Korea’s legal system, albeit at a gradual pace.

Global Attention: The firm’s presence drew significant attention from the global media, academics, and legal professionals. It served as a case study for understanding the challenges of operating in a unique legal environment and the potential impact of legal initiatives on diplomatic relations.

Lessons Learned

Adaptation to Local Realities: The closure of Michael Hay’s law firm highlights the importance of adapting to local realities. Operating in a politically and economically isolated nation requires a deep understanding of the local legal landscape, cultural nuances, and regulatory challenges.

Patience and Incremental Progress: Establishing meaningful legal connections in a closed-off nation necessitates patience and incremental progress. While immediate sweeping changes may not be feasible, small steps toward legal cooperation can have a lasting impact over time.

Importance of Flexibility: The closure of the law firm underscores the importance of flexibility in the face of changing circumstances. In environments where political dynamics are unpredictable, the ability to adapt and diversify is crucial for the sustainability of any foreign venture.


The closure of Michael Hay’s law firm in North Korea marks the end of a bold and pioneering initiative that aimed to bridge legal practices between a reclusive nation and the global community. Despite its closure, the firm’s legacy remains as a testament to the potential for legal cooperation to foster diplomatic ties and initiate meaningful exchanges. The challenges faced by the firm offer valuable lessons for future endeavours that seek to engage with politically isolated countries, emphasising the need for adaptability, patience, and a keen understanding of local realities. As the world continues to navigate complex diplomatic relationships, the story of this law firm serves as a reminder of the power of legal initiatives in shaping global dialogue.

Staying in The Technology Race and Avoiding Pitfalls

It is vital for law firms and in house counsel that they are at the forefront when advising on the specifics and legalities of the technology supply chain, which increasingly relies on mining raw materials for use within the manufacturing process of ‘smart’ products. However, an acute awareness of the barriers is also essential.

Given the increase in protectionist policies, and the inherent link that exists between these and mining essential raw materials, it has never been more important that in house teams work closely with their advisers to anticipate market changes and implement strategies to manoeuvre through what can be difficult events and circumstances.

What is becoming evident, as set out in the report, is that there is a startling correlation between countries that pursue digitally protectionist policies as well those that are protectionist in relation to their natural resources – in particular China, Russia, India, Vietnam, Argentina and Turkey – six key global players in both areas of the economy.

Given that countries like these are the very same which house the essential raw materials that need to be mined to fuel the development of technology, it is crucial to understand how to anticipate the impact of such behaviour on the technology supply chain.

General Counsel could be forgiven for focusing more on the operational and trading aspects relating to the existing uncertainty surrounding Brexit and global trade – and simply seeing digital protectionism as a side-line issue to focus on at a later date.

This would be a mistake, given that these measures pose as much a threat to international trade and development as the more traditional tools of trade protectionism that seem to be most in focus at present.

Not only do the identified countries above have a strong track record in imposing trade barriers and tariffs on imports, they also have a high number of restrictive data laws and large deposits of the vital raw materials needed to make smartphones, connected devices and batteries for electric vehicles.

While this is happening in real time, many technology focused brands – focused on the manufacturing side of the industry – may not yet have anticipated how this will affect their sourcing and subsequent supply chain partners and processes.

This makes it even more important that General Counsel communicate the effect of this on the output of their businesses in order to assist internal relationships or indeed, using the foresight of their selected legal advisers.

The Definitive Guide to Keeping it Professional on Social Media

In today’s business environment, social media allows people to instantly share their opinions with the world. However, given the many heated issues that dominate our national discourse, there can be a tendency to post in anger or passion, which can lead to regrets later.

This risk is especially dangerous for attorneys. While attorneys may sometimes view their presence on social media to be in a “personal” capacity, the reality is that the line between personal and business can be blurred, or may not exist at all.

In particular, with respect to an attorney’s ethical obligations, it may not be a very effective defence for an attorney to claim that she was acting in her personal capacity, and not as a lawyer, when she violated an ethical rule.

Below are some tips for avoiding issues when using social media:

Considering Staying Neutral

Social media is generally not a place for balanced, well-reasoned assessments of issues but is used by many to express visceral reactions to news events. While attorneys may feel the urge to immediately share their thoughts with the world, they do so at their own risk.

For example, if Congress is considering passing a law that may impact a client, an attorney may be inclined to immediately offer her or his opinion on that law without regard to whether that position is aligned with the client’s. Even if the attorney’s posting does not create an actual conflict, a client certainly may be less than pleased to see its law firm advocating for a position if that position stands to harm the client’s business, financial or legal interests.

Likewise, commenting on ongoing cases can also be risky, but attorneys who feel compelled to do so can limit their risks by avoiding taking a definite stance and instead presenting a balanced analysis. That could help avoid creating any potential positional conflict with the interests of a client of the attorney and her or his law firm.

Avoid Unprofessional Conduct

Attorneys understand that their correspondence and briefs should be consistent with the level of decorum expected of members of the bar. Too often, that level of decorum is thrown out the window on social media. However, despite the informality of social media, it should not be considered as a free zone for unprofessional conduct.

A good rule of thumb is to ask whether the comment made on social media would be appropriate if standing outside a courtroom or at a dinner party. Many times, attorneys post comments on social media that they would never say in a face-to-face conversation, much less one with a client.

In some respects, comments on social media are worse than face-to-face conversations, as they are generally broadcast to the world and preserved for posterity. Courts and bars are increasingly taking notice of these issues and applying the same bar rules to social media as they do to traditional legal correspondence.

Think First

The most obvious tip can often be the hardest in practice. Before posting on any substantive issue, it is helpful to stop and think practically about the post and the possible response from their firms, clients, and potential clients. Where practical, it may be a good idea to first run the posting by a colleague or firm leadership to ensure that it does not create any unintended conflicts or client relations issues.

Too often, attorneys instead let their emotions take over and fire off a post without a second thought. While attorneys certainly can use social media effectively in establishing a presence in their community or in a certain practice area, the undisciplined use of social media can unfortunately create the wrong kind of presence very quickly.